1. Should any news agency be held to a specific standard?
A. If "sources" are stated in the story, should at least 3 sources be involved
B. If the sources are anonymously quoted, should reference be made to how many times they were used in the past, and how often they were correct?
C. Should portions of the stories be annotated as to who provided the information?
D. Does the above make a story too much like a professional paper? Could we have all this "stuff" at the end where we can ignore it?
2. Should we bring up to the Pakistani, the Afghani, the Egyptian, and other governments who are "up in arms, the details of their own countries disrespect of other religions?
A. Is damage control the best we can do?
B. Is this a good opportunity to invite other government to open themselves for review by American investigators of religious disrespect while we provide them with entry into our country on a bilateral level?
No comments:
Post a Comment