Mr. Ignatius gets my "There you go again award"
for typical clap trap by an anti-Republican "pundit".
We heard no outrage about the proposal of Mr. Rubio and Mr.
Paul which outlawed visas from "30 Muslim countries with active jihadist
populations.” This, of course includes non-Muslims which are no threats to
us. Where is the logic to that, and why
have these PC versions of Trump's proposals not been denounced?
If you exclude sufficient number of nations you get to the
same result as Trumps more specific Muslim exclusion, but you affect millions
of totally uninvolved people.
India has over 180 M Muslims, if you exclude it, you are
excluding 800+M non-Muslim Indians. Aljazeera
What claptrap this PC approach produces.
Ruth Marcus is true to her bias: "The fault lines are
predictable: Three liberal justices (Justice Elena Kagan is recused because she
was involved in the case as solicitor general) support affirmative action; four
conservatives loathe it; and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy is torn between his
dislike of affirmative action and his aversion to societal upheaval."
Wouldn't it be nice if we talked about the justices view of
the constitution, not their politics? Is Mr. Kennedy averse to affirmative
action, or does he just believe it to be unconstitutional? Why do
"Feelings" need to be involved in Scalia's understanding of the
Constitution.
This lack of respect for the persons trusted with
interpreting the applicability of the Constitution to difficult cases is
painful, but all too common to hear.
--------------------------------------------------Eugene Robinson
I find nothing radical in calling a fellow Senator a liar.
Aren't both of them politicians?
By the Way Mitch and the rest of the Rep Party leaders
promised lots of things (getting rid of Obama Care, defunding NPR and Planned
Parenthood, restraining the president financially, etc. ) and did none of these
things. So aren't they all liars? The specific case dealt with closing the
Government over Obama Care. Mitch was clearly a liar in that area.
Lastly, when Reid can call Scalia a bigot, where do you get
the effrontery of questioning the language of another Senator?
When Mrs. Clinton can only think
Republicans when she thinks of enemies, Cruz's belief that we are dooming the
country through government controls and Obama Care (1/6th of the economy) is
understandable.
Iday
8:52 AM PST
The GOP has courted
Donald Trump for years, every candidate had to take the requested photoshoot
with Donald Trump. He was courted because he question the legitimacy of
President birthright. The uglier Trump's comments, the better the GOP liked
him.
Ted Cruz was promoted as the new up and coming future leader of the GOP. He
was the number one speaker on their banquet circuit. Cruz fell out of favor because
he wanted to rule the roost both the House and the Senate.
The GOP picked the caliber of their candidates , now they should be happy with their
choices.
Ted Cruz was promoted as the new up and coming future leader of the GOP. He
was the number one speaker on their banquet circuit. Cruz fell out of favor because
he wanted to rule the roost both the House and the Senate.
The GOP picked the caliber of their candidates , now they should be happy with their
choices.
rogsonl
8:59 AM PST
No. Cruz lost favor
because he meant what he said. Among politicians, standing of principle will
make you the most hated person in the group.
No one in the group running for president is in Mrs. Clinton's league. By that I mean as liar, ineffectual, self serving, or venal.
No one in the group running for president is in Mrs. Clinton's league. By that I mean as liar, ineffectual, self serving, or venal.
I may not be for him, but clearly Robinson is trying to
insult and deny credence to the Republican Front Runners.
No comments:
Post a Comment