Saturday, January 23, 2016

On Hannah Arendt - An Introduction

I have been reading Eichmann in Jerusalem, saw the Movie Hannah Arendt, and this is my preparation for my Havurah's viewing of this movie. Information taken from Stanford Source and Wikipedia

Born 1906 in Hanover, died 1975 NY.
Studied under Heidegger for 1 year, and had an affair with him.
Studied half a year with Husserl, and then with Karl Jaspers.
Finished her PHD dissertation "Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin” (LA) under Jaspers in 1929.

1.      She was forced to flee Germany in 1933 (like my grandparents) after being arrested by the Gestapo, and eventually moved to Paris until 1941. She spent 6 years till 1939 on Jewish Refugee Organizations. Was interned in “Camp Gurs” as an “enemy alien” for a few weeks in 1937.
2.      Divorced Gunther Stern in 1936 and lived with Heinrich Blucher (expelled from the communist party for supporting joint action with non-communists) whom she married in 1940.
3.      1941 moved to NY with her husband and mother. Illegal visas provided by Hiram Bingham (to 2500 Jews) and monetary support from Varian Fry.
4.      From 41-45 wrote for the Aufbau, from 44 on she directed research for the Commission of European Jewish Cultural Reconstruction and often traveled to Germany. Became a citizen in 1950.
5.      During post war she lectured at Princeton, Berkeley and Chicago, became a professor of Political Philosophy in the New School for Social Research and stayed there until her death.

Writings

1.      1940 Wrote Rachel Varnhagen's biography not published until 1957.
       A fascinating story of a prominent “salon” in the 19th Century and the woman who headed it, one Arendt so associated with she called her her best friend, dead for 100 years.

2.      1959- The Origins of Totalitarianism (OT) – Equated Stalinism and Nazism in both anti-Semitism and imperialism.

3.      1958 - The Human Condition. The concepts of the Political v Social, between Labor v Work. Political life is not universal as a place where individuals achieve freedom through the construction of a common world.

4.      1961 attended the trial of Adolph Eichmann in Jerusalem as a reported for The New Yorker Magazine.

5.   1963 Published Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (EJ) More about this in the movie and below. She was not against the execution of Eichmann stating:

Just as you [Eichmann] supported and carried out a policy of not wanting to share the earth with the Jewish people and the people of a number of other nations—as though you and your superiors had any right to determine who should and who should not inhabit the world—we find that no one, that is, no member of the human race, can be expected to want to share the earth with you. This is the reason, and the only reason, you must hang.

6.   1962 Published On Revolution

Arendt presents a comparison of two of the main revolutions of the eighteenth century, the American and French Revolutions. She goes against a common view of both Marxist and leftist views when she argues that France, while well studied and often emulated, was a disaster and that the largely ignored American Revolution was a success. The turning point in the French Revolution occurred when the leaders rejected their goals of freedom in order to focus on compassion for the masses. In America, the Founding Fathers never betray the goal of Constitutio Libertatis. However, Arendt believes the revolutionary spirit of those men had been lost, and advocates a “council system” as an appropriate institution to regain that spirit.

7.   Between Past and Future and Crises of the Republic

8.   1975- Died after completing the first of 2 volumes on "Thinking and Willing” and "The life of the Mind" published 1978.
          She developed a Socratic method and a conscience which tells us what we cannot do if we wish           to remain “friends with ourselves.”

14.   The third book on "Judging" was unfinished, but some lectures were published posthumously as "Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy (LKPP).
==============================

Conceptions

1.      Political activity trains people in using judgement and achieving a shared view of what is good.
It trains the ability to choose representatives.
It organizes concerted action and can provide a measure of political success.
2.      Human Rights are in conflict with civil rights. Look at refugees, deprived of civil rights guaranteed by a state, they are bereft of all practical rights since no one defends them.
a.      There is also the rejection by the population of refugees as undesirables
b.      There is also the resistance by refugees who attempt to maintain their own ethnic and national identities
c.      The Jewish plight was 1) Removal of citizenship by Germany followed by 2) Removal of stateless refugees to “relocation camps” EJ repeatedly shows this in detail.
This is a very significant subject matter and worth studying the Origins of Totalitarianism
3.      Modernity is the age of bureaucratic administration.
a.      An age of anonymous labor, rather than politics and action, of elite domination and the manipulation of public opinion. Actions are separated from actors. Who screwed up in “Fast and Furious,” who designed “A video did it,” even what is the meaning of “gun violence” in each case a separation between the action and the actor which protect his anonymity.
b.      It is the age where homogeneity and conformity replace plurality and freedom. The concept of “Freedom from speech” current in Universities, areas of refuge, and “Pluralism” defined as restricting speech and action rather than incorporating permissiveness for range.
c.      Isolation and loneliness erode human solidarity and all spontaneous forms of living together. The isolation of the Audio/Video/Phone and the separation between information and contact.
d.      In the form of Stalinism and Nazism, totalitarianism has exploded the established categories of political thought and the accepted standards of moral judgment, and has thereby broken the continuity of our history. Faced with the tragic events of the Holocaust and the Gulag, we can no longer go back to traditional concepts and values, so as to explain the unprecedented by means of precedents, or to understand the monstrous by means of the familiar.

3.      The burden of our time must be faced without the aid of tradition, or as Arendt once put it, “without a bannister ” (RPW, 336).

No comments: