Jewish Journal: UC regents prepare to vote on principles against intolerance
I like what the Regents are trying to do as an expression of their own 1st Amendment right. I don't believe a political statement pro-against Israel, should be an official position for a State supported agency.
What should happen is behaviour should be firmly enforced:
1. Paraphernalia designed to incite our natural tendency to be offended should be prohibited inside a room where a legal meeting by a political group is meeting. As long as you stay outside the meeting and don't interfere with flow do your worst.
Examples:
a. Nazi pictures with Bibi as a Nazi
b. Israeli flags in a pro PLO/Hamas meeting
2. Interrupting the speaker should be forbidden
a. Yelling and screaming to prevent others from listening.
3. Questions and answers should be time limited before each meeting begins.
4. Any physical attempts at interrupting a meeting should result in the expulsion of the participants from the school, as well as their arrest on disturbing the peace.
Infractions of the above should be started by anyone who has proof (simple when everyone has a movie camera) and lead to graduated restrictions up to and including expulsion from the University.
No comments:
Post a Comment